2018
Kahounová, Zuzana; Slabáková, Eva; Binó, Lucia; Remšík, Ján; Fedr, Radek; Bouchal, Jan; Kurfűrstová, Daniela; Vrtěl, Radek; Študent, Vladimír; Jurečková, Lucie; Porokh, Volodymyr; Hampl, Aleš; Souček, Karel
Generation of human iPSCs from human prostate cancer-associated fibroblasts IBPi002-A. Journal Article
In: Stem cell research, vol. 33, pp. 255–259, 2018, ISSN: 1876-7753 1873-5061, (Place: England).
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Aged, Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts/*metabolism, Fibroblasts/*metabolism, Humans, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells/*metabolism, Male, Prostatic Neoplasms/*genetics
@article{kahounova_generation_2018,
title = {Generation of human iPSCs from human prostate cancer-associated fibroblasts IBPi002-A.},
author = {Zuzana Kahounová and Eva Slabáková and Lucia Binó and Ján Remšík and Radek Fedr and Jan Bouchal and Daniela Kurfűrstová and Radek Vrtěl and Vladimír Študent and Lucie Jurečková and Volodymyr Porokh and Aleš Hampl and Karel Souček},
doi = {10.1016/j.scr.2018.11.006},
issn = {1876-7753 1873-5061},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-12-01},
journal = {Stem cell research},
volume = {33},
pages = {255–259},
abstract = {A human induced pluripotent stem cell line was generated from cancer-associated fibroblasts of a 68-years old patient with diagnosed prostate adenocarcinoma (PCa). The fibroblast cell line was reprogrammed with Epi5™ Episomal iPSC Reprogramming Kit. Pluripotency of the derived transgene-free iPS cell line was confirmed both in vitro by detecting expression of factors of pluripotency on a single-cell level, and also in vivo using teratoma formation assay. This new iPS cell line may be used for differentiation into different prostate-specific cell types in differentiation studies.},
note = {Place: England},
keywords = {Aged, Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts/*metabolism, Fibroblasts/*metabolism, Humans, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells/*metabolism, Male, Prostatic Neoplasms/*genetics},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
A human induced pluripotent stem cell line was generated from cancer-associated fibroblasts of a 68-years old patient with diagnosed prostate adenocarcinoma (PCa). The fibroblast cell line was reprogrammed with Epi5™ Episomal iPSC Reprogramming Kit. Pluripotency of the derived transgene-free iPS cell line was confirmed both in vitro by detecting expression of factors of pluripotency on a single-cell level, and also in vivo using teratoma formation assay. This new iPS cell line may be used for differentiation into different prostate-specific cell types in differentiation studies.
Kahounová, Zuzana; Kurfürstová, Daniela; Bouchal, Jan; Kharaishvili, Gvantsa; Navrátil, Jiří; Remšík, Ján; Šimečková, Šárka; Študent, Vladimír; Kozubík, Alois; Souček, Karel
In: Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, vol. 93, no. 9, pp. 941–951, 2018, ISSN: 1552-4930 1552-4922, (Place: United States).
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: anti-fibroblast, Biomarkers/*metabolism, Breast Neoplasms/metabolism, cancer-associated fibroblasts, Cell Line, Endopeptidases, Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule/metabolism, Epithelial Cells/metabolism, Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition/*physiology, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, Female, fibroblast activation protein α, fibroblast surface protein, Fibroblasts/*metabolism, Gelatinases/*metabolism, Humans, Leukocyte Common Antigens/metabolism, Male, Membrane Proteins/*metabolism, PC-3 Cells, Platelet Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-1/metabolism, Prostatic Neoplasms/metabolism, Serine Endopeptidases/*metabolism, Transforming Growth Factor beta1/metabolism, Tumor
@article{kahounova_fibroblast_2018,
title = {The fibroblast surface markers FAP, anti-fibroblast, and FSP are expressed by cells of epithelial origin and may be altered during epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition.},
author = {Zuzana Kahounová and Daniela Kurfürstová and Jan Bouchal and Gvantsa Kharaishvili and Jiří Navrátil and Ján Remšík and Šárka Šimečková and Vladimír Študent and Alois Kozubík and Karel Souček},
doi = {10.1002/cyto.a.23101},
issn = {1552-4930 1552-4922},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-07-01},
journal = {Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology},
volume = {93},
number = {9},
pages = {941–951},
abstract = {The identification of fibroblasts and cancer-associated fibroblasts from human cancer tissue using surface markers is difficult, especially because the markers used currently are usually not expressed solely by fibroblasts, and the identification of fibroblast-specific surface molecules is still under investigation. It was aimed to compare three commercially available antibodies in the detection of different surface epitopes of fibroblasts (anti-fibroblast, fibroblast activation protein α, and fibroblast surface protein). The specificity of their expression, employing fibroblast cell lines and tumor-derived fibroblasts from breast and prostate tissues was investigated. Both the established fibroblast cell line HFF-1 and ex vivo primary fibroblasts isolated from breast and prostate cancer tissues expressed the tested surface markers to different degrees. Surprisingly, those markers were expressed also by permanent cell lines of epithelial origin, both benign and cancer-derived (breast-cell lines MCF 10A, HMLE and prostate-cell lines BPH-1, DU 145, and PC-3). The expression of fibroblast activation protein α increased on the surface of previously described models of epithelial cells undergoing epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in response to treatment with TGF-β1. To prove the co-expression of the fibroblast markers on cells of epithelial origin, we used freshly dissociated human prostate and breast cancer tissues. The results confirmed the co-expression of anti-fibroblast and fibroblast surface protein on CD31/CD45-negative/EpCAM-positive epithelial cells. In summary, our data support the findings that the tested fibroblast markers are not fibroblast specific and may be expressed also by cells of epithelial origin (e.g., cells undergoing EMT). Therefore, the expression of these markers should be interpreted with caution, and the combination of several epitopes for both positive (anti-fibroblast or fibroblast activation protein α) and negative (EpCAM) identification of fibroblasts from breast and prostate tumor tissues is advised. © 2017 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.},
note = {Place: United States},
keywords = {anti-fibroblast, Biomarkers/*metabolism, Breast Neoplasms/metabolism, cancer-associated fibroblasts, Cell Line, Endopeptidases, Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule/metabolism, Epithelial Cells/metabolism, Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition/*physiology, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, Female, fibroblast activation protein α, fibroblast surface protein, Fibroblasts/*metabolism, Gelatinases/*metabolism, Humans, Leukocyte Common Antigens/metabolism, Male, Membrane Proteins/*metabolism, PC-3 Cells, Platelet Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-1/metabolism, Prostatic Neoplasms/metabolism, Serine Endopeptidases/*metabolism, Transforming Growth Factor beta1/metabolism, Tumor},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
The identification of fibroblasts and cancer-associated fibroblasts from human cancer tissue using surface markers is difficult, especially because the markers used currently are usually not expressed solely by fibroblasts, and the identification of fibroblast-specific surface molecules is still under investigation. It was aimed to compare three commercially available antibodies in the detection of different surface epitopes of fibroblasts (anti-fibroblast, fibroblast activation protein α, and fibroblast surface protein). The specificity of their expression, employing fibroblast cell lines and tumor-derived fibroblasts from breast and prostate tissues was investigated. Both the established fibroblast cell line HFF-1 and ex vivo primary fibroblasts isolated from breast and prostate cancer tissues expressed the tested surface markers to different degrees. Surprisingly, those markers were expressed also by permanent cell lines of epithelial origin, both benign and cancer-derived (breast-cell lines MCF 10A, HMLE and prostate-cell lines BPH-1, DU 145, and PC-3). The expression of fibroblast activation protein α increased on the surface of previously described models of epithelial cells undergoing epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in response to treatment with TGF-β1. To prove the co-expression of the fibroblast markers on cells of epithelial origin, we used freshly dissociated human prostate and breast cancer tissues. The results confirmed the co-expression of anti-fibroblast and fibroblast surface protein on CD31/CD45-negative/EpCAM-positive epithelial cells. In summary, our data support the findings that the tested fibroblast markers are not fibroblast specific and may be expressed also by cells of epithelial origin (e.g., cells undergoing EMT). Therefore, the expression of these markers should be interpreted with caution, and the combination of several epitopes for both positive (anti-fibroblast or fibroblast activation protein α) and negative (EpCAM) identification of fibroblasts from breast and prostate tumor tissues is advised. © 2017 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.